O'Neill v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Brian Andrew O'Neill |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Leander Holston |
| 8:2022cv00677 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE; directing the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 3/28/2022. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Brian Andrew O'Neill (Hacking, James) |
|
Filing 3
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 3/22/2022. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Leander Holston, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Leander Holston, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9829757.), filed by BRIAN ANDREW ONEILL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons USCIS, #3 Summons Jaddou, #4 Summons Holston, #5 Summons US Att., #6 Summons Att. General)(Hacking, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
