Subi v. Caudil-Mirillo
| Amuti Subi |
| Ashley Caudil-Mirillo, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 8:2022cv01011 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Ajmel Ahsen Quereshi |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedures Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case electronically transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12
Paperless ORDER granting #11 Stipulated Motion to Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ajmel Ahsen Quereshi on 6/10/2022. (Quereshi, Ajmel)
|
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION to Transfer Case by Amuti Subi (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cleveland, David) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amuti Subi. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 5/18/2022, answer due 6/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cleveland, David) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amuti Subi. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 5/18/2022, answer due 6/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cleveland, David) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amuti Subi. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 5/2/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cleveland, David) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amuti Subi. Ashley Caudil-Mirillo served on 5/2/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cleveland, David) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued 60 days as to Ashley Caudil-Mirillo, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 4
Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ajmel Ahsen Quereshi on 4/29/2022. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Ajmel A. Quereshi. Amuti Subi or counsel for Amuti Subi are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 5/13/2022. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Ajmel Ahsen Quereshi. Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Amuti Subi re #1 Complaint (Cleveland, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9895571.), filed by Amuti Subi.(Cleveland, David) |
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson. Magistrate Judge Ajmel Ahsen Quereshi no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
