Thomas, Jr. v. LVNV et al
| Eunix Thomas, Jr. |
| LVNV, CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Co. and LVNV Funding LLC |
| 8:2022cv01038 |
| April 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paula Xinis |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Removal - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against LVNV Funding LLC, filed by Eunix Thomas, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4
ORDER directing the Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint on or before June 16, 2022. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 5/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(c/m w form 5/26/2022 ybs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 Removal Notification Letter to Pro Se Party (c/m 4/28/2022 ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 State Court COMPLAINT against CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Co., LVNV, filed by Eunix Thomas, Jr..(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court, Prince George's County, case number 050200127852021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9900231), filed by LVNV. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record)(Burnette, Lauren) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (2) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY. (ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
