Anderson v. Goldson et al
| Derrick Anderson |
| Dr. Monica E. Goldson, Dr. Gorman E. Brown, Darlene Davis, Ms. Helen Delacruz, Ms. Florence Gonzales, Ms. Cecilla Rosacena and Mr. Sam Roy |
| 8:2022cv01252 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 cv Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 UNREDACTED MOTION to be Heard by Derrick Anderson (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 UNREDACTED DOCUMENT (Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Fact)(kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting Anderson 28 days from the date of this Order to either retain counsel and have counsel enter their appearance or to file a motion explaining his efforts to retain counsel and why he is unable to do so. Signed by Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 6/21/2022. (c/m 6/22/22 bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Order for Summary Judgment and Demand for Jury Trial) by Derrick Anderson (mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gorman E. Brown, Darlene Davis, Ms. Helen Delacruz, Monica E. Goldson, Ms. Florence Gonzales, Ms. Cecilla Rosacena, Mr. Sam Roy ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 26.), filed by Derrick Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment, #3 Summons)(mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
