Lanasa v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Mark Lanasa |
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP |
8:2022cv01399 |
June 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Deborah L. Boardman |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Mark Lanasa.(Zipin, Philip) |
Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Sarah E Bouchard, Brandon J Brigham, Lauren E Marzullo. Directing attorney Sarah E Bouchard, Brandon J Brigham, Lauren E Marzullo to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering; granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Sarah E Bouchard, Brandon J Brigham, Lauren E Marzullo. Directing attorney Sarah E Bouchard, Brandon J Brigham, Lauren E Marzullo to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering; granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Sarah E Bouchard, Brandon J Brigham, Lauren E Marzullo. Directing attorney Sarah E Bouchard, Brandon J Brigham, Lauren E Marzullo to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 6/27/2022. (dm4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time: Plaintiff's response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is due July 19, 2022 and Defendant's reply is due August 16, 2022. Signed by Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 6/24/2022. (lmys, Chambers) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time by Mark Lanasa (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Zipin, Philip) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Lauren E. Marzullo (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-9997199.) by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (Attachments: #1 Attachment A)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Brandon J. Brigham (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-9997198.) by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (Attachments: #1 Attachment A)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Sarah E. Bouchard (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-9997197.) by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (Attachments: #1 Attachment A)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 9 -SEALED - NOTICE of Filing Under Seal Ex. C to Motion to Dismiss by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Seal Exhibit C to Motion to Dismiss (Unopposed) by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP re #1 Notice of Removal, Defendant's Statement in Support of Notice of Removal (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 5 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 State Court COMPLAINT against AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, filed by Mark Lanasa.(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 103.5(a) Certificate(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP identifying Corporate Parent AstraZeneca PLC for AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP.(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery County Circuit Court, case number C-15-CV-22-001449. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9983999), filed by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard J. Kenny, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (4) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY. (ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lanasa v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mark Lanasa | |
Represented By: | Philip B Zipin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP | |
Represented By: | Matthew J Sharbaugh |
Represented By: | Brandon J Brigham |
Represented By: | Lauren E Marzullo |
Represented By: | Sarah E Bouchard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.