Pinnamareddy v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Uday Kumar Reddy Pinnamareddy |
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur Jaddou |
8:2022cv01807 |
July 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Timothy J Sullivan |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedures Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Sullivan conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Sullivan on 9/6/2022. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Uday Kumar Reddy Pinnamareddy re 4 25 Pct Mag - Notice of Case Assignment to a Magistrate Judge,,,,, #5 25 Pct Mag - Case Management Order, 6 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge on All Defendants, Civil Process Clerk and US Attorney General (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Uday Kumar Reddy Pinnamareddy re #2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement on All Defendants, Civil Process Clerk and US Attorney General (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Uday Kumar Reddy Pinnamareddy. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service on Civil Process Clerk, US Attorney's Office, #2 Proof of Service on US Attorney General)(Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 5 Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Sullivan on 7/25/2022. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Sullivan. Uday Kumar Reddy Pinnamareddy or counsel for Uday Kumar Reddy Pinnamareddy are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 8/8/2022. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued 60 days as to Ur Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Uday Kumar Reddy Pinnamareddy (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10064011.), filed by Uday Kumar Reddy Pinnamareddy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Table, #3 Exhibit A to J, #4 Summons for US Citizenship and Immigration Services, #5 Summons for USCIS Director Ur Jaddou, #6 Summons for US Attorney General Merrick Garland, #7 Summons for Civil Process Clerk, U.S. Attorney's Office)(Rosen, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.