Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Roberts et al
| Choice Hotels International, Inc. |
| John H. Roberts and W. Patrick Murphy |
| 8:2022cv02091 |
| August 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| Gina L Simms |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms for Reviewing a Complaint for Confession of Judgment. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 8/19/2022. (kns, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 8/19/2022. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Choice Hotels International, Inc. (Berge, Zachary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Confessed Judgment against W. Patrick Murphy, John H. Roberts ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10109981.), filed by Choice Hotels International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Affidavit of Gery Brown, #5 Proposed Notice of Entry of Judgment by Confession, John H. Roberts, #6 Proposed Notice of Entry of Judgment by Confession, W. Patrick Murphy, #7 Text of Proposed Order, Entry of Judgment, #8 Text of Proposed Order Judgment, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Berge, Zachary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
