Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. CFP International, LLC
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund and Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments, Extended Benefit Fund and Industry Advancement Fund
Defendant: CFP INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Case Number: 8:2022cv02166
Filed: August 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Paula Xinis
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments, Extended Benefit Fund and Industry Advancement Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund. CFP International, LLC served on 9/14/2022, answer due 10/5/2022.(Gilligan, Charles)
August 29, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to CFP INTERNATIONAL, LLC.(heps, Deputy Clerk)
August 26, 2022 Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments, Extended Benefit Fund and Industry Advancement Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund (Gilligan, Charles)
August 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CFP INTERNATIONAL, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10122425.), filed by Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments, Extended Benefit Fund and Industry Advancement Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit A)(Gilligan, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. CFP International, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the International Training Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments, Extended Benefit Fund and Industry Advancement Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CFP INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?