Brooking v. Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc.
| Wanda Brooking |
| Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. |
| 8:2022cv02581 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah K Chasanow |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Removal - Employment (Wrongful Termination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Plaintiff's Motion Stating the Preservation of Plaintiff's Previously Written Requested Jury Demand in Complaint by Wanda Brooking (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mg3s, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 18 Plaintiff's Motion for Good Cause by Wanda Brooking (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Attachment, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Attachment, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G, #11 Envelope)(mg3s, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 16 NOTICE by Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. DEFENDANTS SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 103.5a (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Attachment 4, #5 Attachment 5, #6 Attachment 6, #7 Attachment 7, #8 Attachment 8, #9 Attachment 9, #10 Attachment 10, #11 Attachment 11, #12 Attachment 12, #13 Attachment 13, #14 Attachment 14, #15 Attachment 15, #16 Attachment 16, #17 Attachment 17, #18 Attachment 18, #19 Attachment 19, #20 Attachment 20, #21 Attachment 21, #22 Attachment 22, #23 Attachment 23, #24 Attachment 24, #25 Attachment 25, #26 Attachment 26)(Chong, Dennis) |
| Filing 15 Rule 12/56 notice mailed to Wanda Brooking (mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss by Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Chong, Dennis) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. re #10 Order, (Chong, Dennis) |
| Filing 12 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. (Chong, Dennis) |
| Filing 11 Removal Notification Letter to Plaintiff (c/m 11/15/2022 - mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 10
ORDER DIRECTING defense counsel to notify Plaintiff and the court within 14 days as to whether service is accepted or refused on behalf of Defendant and DIRECTING Defendant to file a copy of all papers in the state court action pursuant to Local Rule 103.5.a. and to file a disclosure of affiliations and financial interest pursuant to Local Rule 103.3 within 14 days (c/m to Plaintiff 11/14/22 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 11/14/2022. (sat, Chambers)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVED CASE (Chong, Dennis) |
| Filing 8 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (c/m 11/15/2022 - mg3s, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 11/15/2022 (mg3s, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 7 THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (6) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 6 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc., filed by Wanda Brooking. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mg3s, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 5 Supplement to Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex. A Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex. B Order of the Court, #4 Exhibit Ex. C Order of the Court)(Chong, Dennis) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Langley McCally on behalf of Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. (McCally, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. was filed incorrectly. **Document was filed incorrectly. Each state court document (i.e., complaint, summons, etc.) must be properly labeled and filed as separate attachments. Please refile each attachment using the "Other Documents" category, select the "Supplemental" event, and link filing to 1 Notice of Removal. The first labeled attachment can be the main document and the other labeled documents as separate attachments. File any pending motions as separate docket entries. (ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. was filed incorrectly. **Not all attorneys listed as counsel have signed the document. Court staff has entered the appearance of only the attorneys who have signed the document. All other attorneys must enter their own entries of appearance. (ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for PG, case number CA21-09480. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10198525), filed by Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chong, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brooking v. Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wanda Brooking | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Langley McCally |
| Represented By: | Dennis Chong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
