Mui et al v. Doe et al
| AIMEE MUI and VINCENT MUI |
| JOHN DOE and Ceva Logistics US, Inc. |
| 8:2022cv02984 |
| November 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paula Xinis |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle/Wrongful Death |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vincent Mui, Aimee Mui. Ceva Logistics US, Inc. served on 11/29/2022, answer due 12/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit - Summons)(Protil, Karl)
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #3 Consent Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant CEVA Logistics US, Inc. Answer or otherwise Response to the Complaint is EXTENDED to January 20, 2023. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 12/20/2022. (tb2s, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 3
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Ceva Logistics US, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Marshall, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued 21 days as to Ceva Logistics US, Inc..(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Ceva Logistics US, Inc., JOHN DOE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10275594.), filed by VINCENT MUI, AIMEE MUI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons proposed Summons - John Doe, #3 Summons proposed Summons - CEVA Logistics Us, Inc.)(Protil, Karl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
