Stanton v. Roche et al
| Charles Earl Stanton |
| Jan Roche, Randy McClintoch, Shalonda Johnson and Diane Pinto |
| 8:2022cv03208 |
| December 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paula Xinis |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 1/30/2023. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent to receive notice and service electronically by Charles Earl Stanton. The Court recommends that all documents received electronically be printed or saved for future reference.(kb3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
New Case Notification Letter sent to Charles Earl Stanton. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)(C/M 12.13.2022)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Earl Stanton(kb3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Shalonda Johnson, Randy McClintoch, Diane Pinto, Jan Roche, filed by Charles Earl Stanton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(kb3s, Deputy Clerk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/13/2022: #4 Summons and Waiver of Summons) (kb3s, Deputy Clerk).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
