The Washington Marina Company v. Pennington
The Washington Marina Company |
Rodney G Pennington |
8:2022cv03342 |
December 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Gina L Simms |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFAULT as to Rodney G Pennington (c/m 02/06/2022 bus, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Rodney G Pennington (c/, 02/06/2023 bus, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default for want of answer or other defense by The Washington Marina Company(Dilks, Morgan) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Washington Marina Company. Rodney G Pennington served on 12/27/2022, answer due 1/17/2023.(Walsh, Donald) |
Filing 5 Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms on 12/27/2022. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Gina L. Simms. The Washington Marina Company or counsel for The Washington Marina Company are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 1/10/2023. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to Rodney G Pennington. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by The Washington Marina Company (Walsh, Donald) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rodney G Pennington ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10342537.), filed by The Washington Marina Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons to Rodney Pennington)(Walsh, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The Washington Marina Company v. Pennington | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: The Washington Marina Company | |
Represented By: | Donald J Walsh |
Represented By: | Max S Stadfeld |
Represented By: | Morgan Thomas Dilks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rodney G Pennington | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.