Vest v. State of Maryland et al
| Mary Vest |
| State of Maryland and Trooper Kashef Khan |
| 8:2023cv00274 |
| February 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Prince George's County, MD, case number CAL22-21992. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10407014), filed by Kashef Khan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons-State of MD, #3 Summons Summons Khan, #4 Attachment Pl Case Information Sheet, #5 Attachment Complaint, #6 Attachment Affidavit of Service StateMD, #7 Attachment Line Request to Re-issue Summons, #8 Attachment Pl Request for Order of Default, #9 Attachment State's Opposition to Request for Order of Default, #10 Attachment Order granting Request for Default, #11 Attachment State's Answer, #12 Attachment Order denying Request for Default, #13 Attachment Scheduling Order, #14 Attachment Khans Answer, #15 Attachment Notice of Notice of Removal, #16 Attachment Certificate of Notice of Removal)(Foley, Mark) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Theodore D. Chuang. District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
