Arya v. Bank of America, N.A.
| Vikas Arya |
| Bank Of America and Bank of America, N.A. |
| 8:2023cv00453 |
| February 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Peter J Messitte |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond as to #1 Complaint . Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 4/4/2023. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Bank of America, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Bank of America Corporation, Corporate Parent NB Holdings Corporation, Corporate Parent BAC North America Holding Company for Bank of America, N.A..(Duhig, Peter) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Bank of America, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Duhig, Peter) |
| Deficiency Notice for Bank of America, N.A. -- Your Local Rule 103.3 disclosure statement has not been filed. The Statement must be filed by 4/7/2023 (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Bank of America, N.A. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bank Of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10442733.), filed by Vikas Arya. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Bank of America Summons)(Goldson, Ingmar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
