Hall v. CVS Pharmacy et al
| Mr. Dawitt Ralph Hall |
| CVS Pharmacy, CVS Germantown (MD), LLC, Tessa Vermilyah and Kyona Hammonds |
| 8:2023cv01723 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| Deborah L Boardman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER granting Plaintiff 28 days from the date of this Order in which to complete the U.S. Marshal and summons forms and return them to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 8/4/2023. (c/m p as directed 8/4/23 ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 16 Correspondence from Clerk re: Transfer Notification Letter (c/m p 6/26/23 ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 15 Case transferred in from District of South Carolina; Case Number 4:23-cv-01492. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 14
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's case is transferred in the interests of justice to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland for further handling. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 6/26/2023. (gnan )
|
| Filing 13 Letter from Dawitt Ralph Hall. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lgib, ) |
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Dawitt Ralph Hall, #31104-007, FCI Williamsburg, PO Box 340, Salters, SC, 29590 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this case be transferred in the interests of justice to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland for further handling. Objections to R&R due by 6/14/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 05/31/2023. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CVS Pharmacy, CVS Germantown (MD), LLC, Tessa Vermilyah, Kyona Hammonds filed by Dawitt Ralph Hall. Service due by 8/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 Proper Form Order w/NEF, Complaint for Civil Case and Prisoner Complaint Form, 6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Dawitt Ralph Hall, #31104-007, FCI Williamsburg, PO Box 340, Salters, SC, 29590 (dsto, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #5 Proper Form Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 04/25/2023.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 5/16/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 04/25/2023. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Dawitt Ralph Hall. Response to Motion due by 4/26/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CVS Pharmacy, filed by Dawitt Ralph Hall. Service due by 7/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
