Paul v. Patuxent Cardiology Associates, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Ghislaine Paul
Defendant: Patuxent Cardiology Associates, LLC and Vasundhara Muthu
Case Number: 8:2023cv01866
Filed: July 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Deborah K Chasanow
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2023 Filing 6 RESPONSE to #5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Ghislaine Paul. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Record Extract 2022, #3 Affidavit, #4 Order, #5 Daily Sheet, #6 Record Extract, #7 Appendices, #8 Envelope) (hmls, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 7/28/2023 (hmls, Deputy Clerk).
July 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, response due by 7/28/2023 (c/m to Plaintiff 7/14/23 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 7/14/2023. (sat, Chambers)
July 13, 2023 Filing 4 Correspondence from Clerk to Plaintiff re: Removal Notification Letter. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
July 13, 2023 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
July 6, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Vasundhara Muthu, Patuxent Cardiology Associates, LLC filed by Ghislaine Paul. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
July 6, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the Circuit Court for Calvert County filed by Ghislaine Paul. (Case number C-04-CV-22-000148) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 E2 Summons, #3 E3 Attachments, #4 E4 Moton to Dismiss and Attachments, #5 E5 Response to Petition for Medical Records, #6 E6 Motion for Court Appointed Expert, #7 E7 Oppositon to Motion to Dismiss, #8 E8 Transcript, #9 E9 E-Mail, #10 E10 Motion for In Banc Review, #11 E11 Motion to Dismiss In Banc Review, #12 E12 Order, #13 E13 Order, #14 E14 Motion for Reconsideration, #15 E15 Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration, #16 E16 Order, #17 E17 Notice of Appeal, #18 E18 Order, #19 Appellate Docket, #20 Appeal Info Report, #21 Appellee's Brief, #22 Motion for Reconsideration, #23 Previous Dockets, #24 Docket, #25 Record Extracts, #26 Envelope) (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
July 6, 2023 THE ABOVE DOCUMENT (2) IS A COPY OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paul v. Patuxent Cardiology Associates, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ghislaine Paul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patuxent Cardiology Associates, LLC
Represented By: Curtis H Booth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vasundhara Muthu
Represented By: Stephen M Cornelius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?