Arndt v. Government Employees Insurance Company
| TIMOTHY ARNDT |
| Government Employees Insurance Company |
| 8:2023cv02842 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L Boardman |
| Matthew J Maddox |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Reassigned to Judge Matthew J. Maddox. Judge Deborah L. Boardman no longer assigned to the case. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 9 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Government Employees Insurance Company identifying Other Affiliate GEICO Corporation, Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Other Affiliate GEICO Advantage Insurance Company (NE), Other Affiliate Boat America Corporation (VA), Other Affiliate GEICO Choice Insurance Company (NE), Other Affiliate GEICO Indemnity Company (NE), Other Affiliate GEICO Secure Insurance Company (NE), Other Affiliate GEICO Financial Services, GmbH (Federal Republic of Germany), Other Affiliate Plaza Resources Company (DE), Other Affiliate GEICO General Insurance Company (NE), Other Affiliate Plaza Financial Services Company (DE), Other Affiliate GEICO Casualty Company (NE), Other Affiliate Criterion Insurance Agency, Inc. (TX), Other Affiliate Boat Owners Association of the United States (DC), Other Affiliate GEICO Marine Insurance Company (NE), Other Affiliate Maryland Ventures, Inc. (DE), Other Affiliate The Top Five Club, Inc. (TX), Other Affiliate GEICO Products, Inc. (DE), Other Affiliate Government Employees Financial Corporation (TX), Other Affiliate International Insurance Underwriters, Inc. (NE), Other Affiliate GEICO Insurance Agency, LLC (MD) for Government Employees Insurance Company.(Gordon, Glenn) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Government Employees Insurance Company(Gordon, Glenn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John Edward McCann, Jr on behalf of Government Employees Insurance Company (McCann, John) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn A Gordon on behalf of Government Employees Insurance Company (Gordon, Glenn) |
| Deficiency Notice for Government Employees Insurance Company -- Your Local Rule 103.3 disclosure statement has not been filed. The Statement must be filed by 11/16/2023 (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Timothy Arndt. Government Employees Insurance Company served on 10/26/2023, answer due 11/16/2023.(Nathan, Steven) |
| Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Joseph H. Kanee. Directing attorney Joseph H. Kanee to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 10/24/2023. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Joseph H. Kanee (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-10886043.) by Timothy Arndt(Nathan, Steven) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Government Employees Insurance Company. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Government Employees Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10880767.), filed by TIMOTHY ARNDT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons)(Pizzirusso, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
