Paul v. Maryland Office of the Medical Examiner
Ghislaine Paul |
Maryland Office of the Medical Examiner, Walgreen Co, Cigna Health Management, Inc., Patuxent Cardiology Associates and Vasundhara Muthu |
8:2023cv03235 |
November 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Theodore D Chuang |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ghislaine Paul. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Ghislaine Paul (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Envelope)(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 New Case Notification Letter sent to Ghislaine Paul. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 11/29/23) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Maryland Office of the Medical Examiner, filed by Ghislaine Paul. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Death Certificate, #3 Envelope)(dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/nef staff attys) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.