Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
| John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 68.33.118.153 and John Doe |
| 8:2023cv03478 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paula Xinis |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 MOTION to Expedite Discovery. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 2/2/2024. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Expedite Discovery by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Declaration of David Williamson, #3 Exhibit Declaration of Patrick Paige, #4 Exhibit Declaration of Susan B. Stalzer, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Fernandez, Jessica) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action (c/m 12/27/2023 - bw5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC.(Fernandez, Jessica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Property Rights Infringement against John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 68.33.118.153 ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11002668.), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Fernandez, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
