Davis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Plaintiff: LEONARD A DAVIS and Leonard A. Davis
Defendant: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Case Number: 8:2024cv00160
Filed: January 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Deborah L Boardman
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2024 Filing 9 STATUS REPORT (Joint) by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority(Guss, Michael)
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 LETTER ORDER Scheduling Conference Call for February 21, 2024 at 4:30 p.m.. Signed by Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 2/1/2024. (c/m 2/02/2024 bas, Deputy Clerk)
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: Informal Discovery Dispute Procedure. Signed by Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 2/1/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Scheduling Order)(c/m 2/2/2024 bas, Deputy Clerk)
January 22, 2024 Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (c/m 1/22/2024 bas, Deputy Clerk)
January 22, 2024 Filing 5 Removal Notification Letter sent to Plaintiff. (c/m 1/22/2024 bas, Deputy Clerk)
January 17, 2024 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, filed by Leonard A. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Case Information Report)(bas, Deputy Clerk)
January 17, 2024 THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (4) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE Circuit Court for Montgomery Court. (bas, Deputy Clerk)
January 17, 2024 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.(Guss, Michael)
January 17, 2024 Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (Guss, Michael)
January 17, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from CIRCUIT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, case number C-15-CV-23-003966. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11036585), filed by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Previous Filings in State Court, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Exhibit Summons, #5 Exhibit Notice of New Case Number, #6 Exhibit Scheduling Order, #7 Exhibit Civil Information Sheet)(Guss, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LEONARD A DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leonard A. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Represented By: Michael Kelly Guss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?