Potter v. O'Malley
Plaintiff: Rhonda Lynette Potter and Rhonda Lynelle Potter
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party: Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Case Number: 8:2024cv00178
Filed: January 19, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Charles D Austin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2024 Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of David F Chermol. Directing attorney David F Chermol to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 2/15/2024. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)
February 13, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David F. Chermol (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-11086272.) by Rhonda Lynelle Potter(Shea, Stephen)
January 22, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles D. Austin. Pursuant to Standing Order 2021-12, which can be downloaded #here, Rhonda Lynelle Potter or counsel for Rhonda Lynelle Potter has 30 days from the date of this notice to file their consent or declination to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent or declination, go to Civil > Correspondence > Magistrate Judge - consent/decline. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Magistrate Election Form due by 2/21/2024. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 22, 2024 Filing 2 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Kelly M Marzullo on behalf of Martin J. O'Malley. A certified copy of the transcript of the record is due on 3/22/2024 unless otherwise ordered. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 19, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin J. O'Malley ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11039785.), filed by Rhonda Lynette Potter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shea, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Potter v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rhonda Lynette Potter
Represented By: Stephen F Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rhonda Lynelle Potter
Represented By: David F Chermol
Represented By: Stephen F Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Represented By: Kelly M Marzullo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?