Fonge v. EMR Express, Inc. et al
| Cyprian Fonge |
| EMR Express, Inc. and Gregory Thigpen |
| 8:2024cv01576 |
| May 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah K Chasanow |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J McCloskey on behalf of EMR Express, Inc., Gregory Thigpen (McCloskey, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by EMR Express, Inc., Gregory Thigpen / Consent to Removal (McCarron, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by EMR Express, Inc., Gregory Thigpen / Response to Standing Order Concerning Removal (McCarron, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by EMR Express, Inc., Gregory Thigpen / Notice to Adverse Party (McCarron, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.5 (Attachments: #1 Ex A1 Civil Case Info Report, #2 Ex A2 Complaint (state ct), #3 Ex A3 Demand for Jury Trial (state ct), #4 Ex A4 Pltf Interrog to Def (state ct), #5 Ex A5 Pltf RFPD to Def (state ct), #6 Ex A6 Summons (state ct), #7 Ex A7 Docket, #8 Ex B Answer to Complaint (state ct), #9 Ex C - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal (state ct))(McCarron, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuirt Court for Prince George's County, case number C-16-CV-24-000570. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11291923), filed by Gregory Thigpen, EMR Express, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McCarron, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
