Forcinito et al v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company
| Michael Forcinito and Carey Lawrence |
| Travelers Personal Insurance Company |
| 8:2024cv01709 |
| June 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 6/12/2024. (ds2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 Correspondence re: Removal Statement (Strickland, Bradley) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Travelers Personal Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Standard Fire Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Travelers Property Casualty Corp., Corporate Parent Travelers Insurance Group Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent The Travelers Companies, Inc. for Travelers Personal Insurance Company.(Strickland, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Montgomery County, case number C-15-CV-24-000496. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11315829), filed by Travelers Personal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Resp. to Def. Interrogatories, #2 Exhibit B - previously filed pleadings, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing a Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Strickland, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
