Diallo v. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Fatoumata Woury Diallo |
| USCIS Refugee, Asylum and International Operations Directorate, Merrick Garland, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security and USCIS Arlington Asylum Office |
| 8:2024cv02235 |
| July 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Lydia Kay Griggsby |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 QC NOTICE re: #1 Complaint, filed by Fatoumata Woury Diallo was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments are missing - Summons for each Defendant, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. To correct this problem, file Summons for each Defendant, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General using the event Notice (Other) and link Summons for each Defendant, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General to #1 Complaint. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. Judge Julie Rebecca Rubin no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Action in Mandamus for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11404720.), filed by FATOUMATA WOURY DIALLO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Notice of Action, #3 Exhibit B- USCIS Response)(Ngamga Kamtchoum, Gertrude) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
