Utra-Lawrence v. Nolan et al
Plaintiff: Jessy Utra-Lawrence
Defendant: Connie Nolan, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas
Case Number: 8:2024cv02986
Filed: October 15, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Charles D Austin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jessy Utra-Lawrence. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 10/20/2024, answer due 12/19/2024. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service with Exhibit)(Allen, Roberto)
November 5, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jessy Utra-Lawrence. Alejandro Mayorkas served on 10/31/2024, answer due 12/30/2024; Connie Nolan served on 10/24/2024, answer due 12/23/2024. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service with Exhibits)(Allen, Roberto)
November 5, 2024 Filing 4 QC NOTICE: #3 Affidavit of Service filed by Jessy Utra-Lawrence was filed using the incorrect event. **Please refile affidavit under the "Service of Process" category, select the "Summons Returned Executed as to USA" event, and enter the service date when requested. It has been marked FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
November 4, 2024 Filing 3 (FILED IN ERROR) AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint, Summons, Civil Cover Sheet served on Connie Nolan, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Erik L. Baron on Nolan (10-24-2024); Mayorkas (10-31-2024); Garland (10-23-2024); Baron (10-24-2024), filed by Jessy Utra-Lawrence. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service with Exhibits)(Allen, Roberto) Modified on 11/5/2024 (hmls).
October 17, 2024 Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(ar6s, Deputy Clerk)
October 15, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Complaint and Petition for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11547932.), filed by Jessy Utra-Lawrence. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Allen, Roberto)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Utra-Lawrence v. Nolan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessy Utra-Lawrence
Represented By: Roberto N Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Connie Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?