Pady v. United States Attorney General et al
| Nagi Pady |
| DD Mick Dedvukaj, MERRICK B GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Ur M Jaddou, Christopher Wray, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, District Director of, United States Attorney General, United States Department of Homeland Security, Secretary of, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of and Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of |
| 2:2022cv12839 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Naturalization Application |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin A. Anchill on behalf of All Defendants. (Anchill, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants and U.S. Attorney * (DPer) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Nagi Pady against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9139968 - Fee: 402 dollars. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit) (Dhade, Herman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
