ADC Telecommun v. Panduit Corp
Plaintiff: ADC Telecommunications, Inc.
Defendant: Panduit Corp
Case Number: 0:2001cv00477
Filed: March 15, 2001
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Janie S Mayeron
Referring Judge: Ann D Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2003. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2003 Filing 130 RECEIPT singed by counsel for defendant for the reuturn of sealed documents. (1 pg) (MKC)
October 9, 2003 Filing 129 NOTICE OF INTENT TO DESTROY DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL. 1 pg(s) (VEM)
April 22, 2003 Filing 128 MINUTES:( Judge Ann D. Montgomery / ) the court has been advised that this matter is settled; therefore this case is dismissed. (1 pg) (MKC)
April 21, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 127 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING COUNTS 1-VII AND PANDUIT'S CORRESPONDING COUNTERCLAIMS SEEKING DECLARATION OF NONINFRINGEMENT, INVALIDITY OR UNENFORCEABILITY OF THE PATENTS ASSERTED IN COUNTS 1-VII WITH PREJUDICE ( Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) the court dismisses all claims and all counterclaims in this action with prejudice (4 pgs)(cc: all counsel) (MKC)
April 17, 2003 Filing 126 DECLARATION of Dennis C. Bremer re motion for leave to file supplemental expert reports of Michael Chase and Glenn Beall [116-1], re motion in limine to preclude Glenn Beall from Testifying that Panduit's original spill-over fittings do not infringe[124-1], re motion in limine to preclude Glenn Beall from Testifying on opinions Expressed in Eric Pearson's report [123-1], re motion in limine to preclude Panduit from Relying on Prior Art Not identified in Panduit's Prior Art Statement, ) [121-1], re motion in limine to exclude testimony re: comparisons of Panduit's accused couplers and ADC's commercial embodiments [119-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
April 17, 2003 Filing 125 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff ADC Telecommun in opposition to Panduit's motion for leave to file supplemental expert reports of Michael Chase and Glenn Beall. [116-1] (13 pgs) (MKC)
April 17, 2003 Filing 124 MOTION by plaintiff ADC Telecommun in limine to preclude Glenn Beall from Testifying that Panduit's original spill-over fittings do not infringe ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) . (9 pgs) (MKC)
April 17, 2003 Filing 123 MOTION by plaintiff ADC Telecommun in limine to preclude Glenn Beall from Testifying on opinions Expressed in Eric Pearson's report ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) . (10 pgs) (MKC)
April 17, 2003 Filing 122 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of motion in limine to preclude Panduit from Relying on Prior Art Not identified in Panduit's Prior Art Statement . [121-1] (13 pgs) (MKC)
April 17, 2003 Filing 121 MOTION by plaintiff ADC Telecommun in limine to preclude Panduit from Relying on Prior Art Not identified in Panduit's Prior Art Statement ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) . (2 pgs) (MKC)
April 17, 2003 Filing 120 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff ADC Telecommun in support of motion in limine to exclude testimony re: comparisons of Panduit's accused couplers and ADC's commercial embodiments . [119-1] (6 pgs) (MKC)
April 17, 2003 Filing 119 MOTION by plaintiff in limine to exclude testimony re: comparisons of Panduit's accused couplers and ADC's commercial embodiments ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) (4 pgs) (MKC)
April 17, 2003 Filing 118 MOTION by defendant for leave to file supplemental expert reports of Michael Chase and Glenn Beall ( to Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron ) ret 5/5/03 at 3:00 (3 pgs) (MKC)
April 14, 2003 Filing 117 NOTICE PURSUANT TO 35 usc 282 by Panduit Corp. (9 pgs) (MKC)
April 11, 2003 Filing 116 MOTION by defendant for leave to file supplemental expert reports of Michael Chase and Glenn Beall ( to Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron ) . (86 pgs) (MKC) Modified on 04/15/2003
March 21, 2003 Filing 115 PETITION AND ORDER for admission pro hac vice ( Clerk Richard D. Sletten ) on behalf of Panduit Corp, by Eric R Moran . (1 pgs) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
March 20, 2003 Filing 114 REQUEST by Panduit Corp for RULE 16 CONFERENCE. (3 pgs) (MKC)
February 11, 2003 Filing 113 NOTICE TO COUNSEL ( Clerk Richard D. Sletten / 2/11/03) Case referred to Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron 1pg(s) (cc: all counsel) (DFL)
January 24, 2003 Filing 112 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by plaintiff ADC Telecommun that none exist 2pg(s) (
January 23, 2003 Filing 111 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASES FOR TRIAL ( Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) jury trial set beginning 5/12/03 3pg(s) (cc: all counsel) (SJH)
January 13, 2003 Filing 110 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by defendant Panduit Corp that none exist 2pg(s) ( Modified on 01/21/2003
January 8, 2003 Filing 109 ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION: terminating the law firm of Merchant & Gould and substituting the lawf firm of Carlson, Caspers Vandenburgh & Lindquist. (2 pgs) (MKC)
December 11, 2002 Filing 108 MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER: ( Judge Ann D. Montgomery / 12/11/02)re: 1. Panduit's motion for summary judgment of invalidity and non-infringement as to U.S. Patent '181 is granted as to literal infringment by the modified accused devuce but denied as to literal infringement by the unmodified accused device, invalidity and infringement under the doctrine of equivalents; [89-1], 2. Panduit's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement as to U.S. Patent No. '243 is DENIED. [92-1] 3. Panduit's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement as to U.S. Patent No. '781 is GRANTED. [86-1] (35 pgs) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
November 14, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER OF RECUSAL( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 11/14/02) Case referred to Chief Mag. Judge Jonathan G. Lebedoff (2 pgs) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
November 13, 2002 Filing 106 TRANSCRIPT OF defendnt's motions for summary judgment held 8/30/02 by Judge Ann D. Montgomery ( Timothy J. Willette, RDR) ( 74 pgs) (SEPARATE) (MKC)
November 13, 2002 Filing 105 TRANSCRIPT OF motion for Markman hearing and defendant's motion for summary judgment held 1/11/02 by Judge Ann D. Montgomery ( Timothy J. Willette, RDR) (127 pgs) (SEPARATE) (MKC)
September 13, 2002 Filing 104 NOTICE OF ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) settlement conference set for 9:00 am on 11/21/02 2 pg(s) (cc: all counsel) (VEM)
September 11, 2002 Filing 103 EXHIBIT LIST for the 8/30/02 summary judgmetn hearing by plaintiff ADC Telecommun (2 pgs) (MKC)
August 30, 2002 Filing 102 MINUTES ( Judge Ann D. Montgomery / Tim Willette) Dft's Summary Judgment Motions heard and taken under advisement [92-1] [89-1] [86-1] 1pg(s) (
August 9, 2002 Filing 101 MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER: ( Judge Ann D. Montgomery / 8/9/02)that: 1. Judge Boylan's orders of 6/5/02 and 6/14/02 are AFFIRMED; 2. Panduit's appeal is DENIED. [78-1] 3. ADC's appeal is DENIED. [81-1] (5 pgs) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
July 10, 2002 Filing 100 MEMORANDUM by defendant in opposition to ADC'S appeal from Magistrate Judge's Order of 6/14/02. [81-1] (18 pgs) (MKC)
July 2, 2002 Filing 99 Combined APPENDIX with Exhibits, Volume 2, filed by plaintiff re motions for summary judgment [92-1] [89-1] [86-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH)
July 2, 2002 Filing 98 Combined APPENDIX of Exhibits, Volume 1, filed by plaintiff re motions for summary judgment [92-1] 891 [86-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH) Modified on 07/05/2002
July 2, 2002 Filing 97 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to motion for summary judgment of non-infringement as to U.S. Patent No. 5,316,243 [92-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH)
July 2, 2002 Filing 96 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to motion for summary judgment of non-infringement as to U.S. Patent No. 5,752,781 [86-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH)
July 2, 2002 Filing 95 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to motion for summary judgment of invalidity and non-infringement as to U.S. Patent 6,192,181 B1 [89-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH)
July 2, 2002 Filing 94 DECLARATION of Nicole A. Fiorella with exhibits re motion for summary judgment of non-infringement as to U.S. Patent No. 5,316,243 [92-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH)
July 2, 2002 Filing 93 MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of motion for summary judgment of non-infringement as to U.S. Patent No. 5,316,243 [92-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH)
July 2, 2002 Filing 91 DECLARATION of Nicole A. Fiorella with exhibits re motion for summary judgment of invalidity and non-infringement as to U.S. Patent 6,192,181 B1 [89-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH)
July 2, 2002 Filing 90 MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of motion for summary judgment of invalidity and non-infringement as to U.S. Patent 6,192,181 B1 [89-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH)
July 2, 2002 Filing 88 DECLARATION of Nicole A. Fiorella with exhibits re motion for summary judgment of non-infringement as to U.S. Patent No. 5,752,781 [86-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH)
July 2, 2002 Filing 87 MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of motion for summary judgment [86-1] (sealed - separate) (SJH)
July 1, 2002 Filing 85 DECLARATION of Mark D. Schuman with attached exhibits re appeal from Magistrate Judge's Order of 6/5/02 [78-1] 70pg(s) (SJH)
July 1, 2002 Filing 84 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to dft's appeal from Magistrate Judge's Order of 6/5/02 [78-1] 10pg(s) (SJH)
June 25, 2002 Filing 83 EXHIBITS to ADC/s Appeal under local Rule 72.1(b)92) from Magistrate Judge Boylan's order of 6/14/02 by plaintiff [82-1] (60 pgs) (MKC)
June 25, 2002 Filing 82 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of appeal from Magistrate Judge's Order of 6/14/02. [81-1] (5 pgs) (MKC)
June 25, 2002 Filing 81 NOTICE OF APPEAL from Magistrate Judge's Order of 6/14/02( to Ann D. Montgomery ) by plaintiff . [77-1] (2 pgs) (MKC)
June 17, 2002 Filing 80 EXHIBITS by Panduit Corp to appeal of magistrate's order [78-1] (DFL)
June 17, 2002 Filing 79 MEMORANDUM by Panduit Corp in support of appeal from Magistrate Judge's Order of 6/5/02 [78-1] 8pg(s) (DFL)
June 17, 2002 Filing 78 APPEAL from Magistrate Judge's Order( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) by Panduit Corp concerning order of 6/5/02 [75-1] 2pgs (DFL)
June 14, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 6/14/02) that: 1. Whether expert reports of Professor Stoll and Mr. Pearson can be appropriately subsumed in Mr. Bell's testimony is an evidentiary question that should be reserved for trial; 2. In support of its motions for summary judgment Defendant may rely on affidavits of experts who will not be called to testify at trial; 3. Plaintiff shall serve its reposnse to defendant's motion for summary judgment personally as opposed to by mail on or before 7/1/02/ 4. Because Plaintiff insists that it must have all of 7/1/02 to work on its response to defendant's motions, if defendant files its motion for summary judgment by 7/2/02 filing will be considered timely. (1 pg) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
June 10, 2002 Filing 92 MOTION by defendant for summary judgment of non-infringement as to U.S. Patent No. 5,316,243 ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) 2pg(s) (SJH)
June 10, 2002 Filing 89 MOTION by defendant for summary judgment of invalidity and non-infringement as to U.S. Patent 6,192,181 B1 ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) 2pg(s) (SJH)
June 10, 2002 Filing 86 MOTION by defendant for summary judgment of non-infringement as to U.S. Patent No. 5,752,781 ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) 2pg(s) (SJH) Modified on 07/05/2002
June 10, 2002 Filing 76 LETTER RE: SVC OF DISPOSITIVE MOTION PAPERS by Panduit Corp for summary judgment SVC.LTR. ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) (2 pgs) (MKC)
June 5, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 6/5/02) [71-1] that: 1. Each party shall be entitled to call not more than 4 experts at trial. 2. The request that the court extend deadline for commpleting expert depositions beyond 6/22/02 is denied. (1 pg) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
June 4, 2002 Filing 74 RESPONSE by defendant to ADC's motion in limine to exclude any and all evicence and references by Panduit to US Patent No. Des. 210,287. [68-1] (3 pgs) (MKC)
June 3, 2002 Filing 73 DECLARATION of Carol Ross re motion to strike the expert reports and preclude trial testimony from Walter Kirn and Henry Stoll [71-1] 1+pg(s) (PAK)
June 3, 2002 Filing 72 MEMORANDUM by pltf in support of motion to strike the expert reports and preclude trial testimony from Walter Kirn and Henry Stoll [71-1] 8pg(s) (PAK)
June 3, 2002 Filing 71 MOTION by pltf to strike the expert reports and preclude trial testimony from Walter Kirn and Henry Stoll ( to Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) 4pg(s) (PAK) Modified on 06/06/2002
May 22, 2002 Filing 70 DECLARATION of Mark D. Schuman re motion in limine to exclude any and all evicence and references by Panduit to Patent No. Des. 210,287. (with exhibits)[68-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
May 22, 2002 Filing 69 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of motion in limine to exclude any and all evicence and references by Panduit to US Patent No. Des. 210,287 . [68-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
May 22, 2002 Filing 68 MOTION by plaintiff in limine to exclude any and all evidence and references by Panduit to US Patent No. Des. 210,287 ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) . (2 pgs) (MKC) Modified on 06/06/2002
May 7, 2002 Filing 67 LETTER to court dated 5/6/02 from Samuel Hamer of Merchant & Gould requesting that Dennis Bremers names be removed as counsel of record for ADC Telecommun (1 pg(s) (MKC)
April 30, 2002 Filing 66 AMENDED ANSWER to Third Amended Complaint [33-1] [24-1] [14-1] [1-1] by defendant; Counterclaim and Jury Demand (sealed - separate) (SJH)
April 30, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) that dft file the original of its First Amended Answer, Counterclaim and Jury Demand to ADC's Third Amended Complaint, as provided in Local Rule 15.1 [62-1] 1pg(s) (cc: all counsel) (SJH)
April 24, 2002 Filing 64 MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER: ( Judge Ann D. Montgomery / 4/24/02) that: 1. The patent claims are to be construed as set for in III(A) of this order; and 2. Panduit's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. [39-1] (24 pgs) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
April 2, 2002 Filing 63 EXHIBIT A to defendant's motion for leave to file a amended answer, counterclaim and jury demand. [62-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
April 2, 2002 Filing 62 MOTION by defendant for leave to file a first amended answer, conterclaim and jury demand in response to ADC's third Amended complaint ( to Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) . (5 pgs) (MKC)
March 25, 2002 Filing 61 JOINT MOTION AND ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) for an extension of the dates for exchanging expert report and completing expert depsotions. pg(s)(cc: all counsel) (MKC)
February 20, 2002 Filing 60 JOINT MOTION AND ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) re: an extension of the dates for exchanging expert reports: 4/1/02 for submisison of initial experts reports and 5/1/02 rebuttal expert reports. (2 pgs)(cc: all counsel) (MKC)
January 28, 2002 Filing 58 MINUTES:( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / ) telephone conference re: Discovery Issues. (1 pg) (MKC)
January 16, 2002 Filing 57 PETITION AND ORDER for admission pro hac vice ( Clerk Richard D. Sletten ) on behalf of defendant Panduit Corp by Anthoula Pomrening. (1 pg) (MKC)
January 11, 2002 Filing 59 MINUTES:( Judge Ann D. Montgomery / Tim Willette) taking under advisement on the dft's motion for summary judgment [39-1] 1pg(s) (PAK)
January 7, 2002 Filing 56 DECLARATION of Nicole A. Fiorella (sealed) (separate) (MKC) Modified on 01/29/2002
January 7, 2002 Filing 55 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF FILED by defendant Panduit Corp. (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
January 4, 2002 Filing 54 EXHIBITS 41-81 by plaintiff/ Commbined appendix for its claim interpretation briefs. (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
January 4, 2002 Filing 53 EXHIBITS 1-40 by plaintiff combined appendix for its claim interpretation briefs. (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
January 4, 2002 Filing 52 MARKMAN BRIEF FILED by plaintiff ADC Telecommun regarding the design patents, U.S. Patent Nos Des. 320,782; 321,682; 334,380 and 327,874 (sealed) (spearate) (MKC)
January 4, 2002 Filing 51 MARKMAN BRIEF FILED by plaintiff ADC Telecommun re: claim construction of u.S. Patent no 6,192,181 B1. (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
January 4, 2002 Filing 50 MARKMAN BRIEF FILED by plaintiff ADC Telecommun regarding claim construction of U.S. Patent No. 5,316,243. (separate)(sealed) (MKC)
January 4, 2002 Filing 49 BRIEF FILED by plaintiff in support of its motion for Markman Ruling Re U.S. P{atent No 5,752.781; (MKC)
December 26, 2001 Filing 48 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT 47 pg(s) (GJS)
December 17, 2001 Filing 47 SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS by defendant to motion for summary judgment. [39-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
December 17, 2001 Filing 46 REPLY by defendant to motion for summary judgment . [39-1] (sealed)( separte) (MKC)
December 17, 2001 Filing 45 DECLARATION of Ray L. Henneberger re motion for summary judgment . [39-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
December 17, 2001 Filing 44 DECLARATION of Danny J. Cunagin re motion for summary judgment. [39-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
December 17, 2001 Filing 43 DECLARATION of Mark D. Schuman re motion for summary judgment. [39-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
December 17, 2001 Filing 42 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to motion for summary judgment .[39-1] (sealed)(separate) (MKC)
December 17, 2001 Filing 41 EXHIBITS by defendant to motion for summary judgment [40-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC)
December 17, 2001 Filing 40 MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of motion for summary judgment. [39-1] (15 pgs) (MKC)
December 17, 2001 Filing 38 JOINT MOTION AND ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan )for an extension of certain dates established by the scheduling orders. ; discovery set for 2/8/02 (2 pgs)(cc: all counsel) (MKC)
November 14, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 11/13/01) that the 1. The Markman/summary judgmetn hearing shall be on 1/10/02 at 1:30. 2. The Joint claim construction statement shall be filed on or before 12/21/01 and 3. The Markman briefs shall be served and filed on or before 1/4/02. (1 pg) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
October 30, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 10/29/01)that: 1. The Points of novelty issue will be treated as a factual inquiry, not a claim construction issue; 2. As a matter of claim construciton, the court will address withether the particular features of the at-issue design patents are functionl or ornamental; and 3. The parties shall submit a joint claim constuction statement and Markman briefs not inconsistent with this order. (5 pgs) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
October 24, 2001 Filing 35 REPLY by ADC Telecommun to defendant's counterclaim. (3 pgs) (MKC)
October 18, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER ( Judge Ann D. Montgomery / 10/17/01)that: 1. In December 2001, on a date to be determined, the Markman hearing and the summary judgment hearing will be held jointly. (2 pgs) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
October 16, 2001 Filing 33 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT [24-1] by plaintiff; jury demand ( 66 pgs) (MKC)
October 12, 2001 Filing 32 PETITION AND ORDER for admission pro hac vice ( Clerk Richard D. Sletten ) on behalf of defendant by Leif R Sigmond Jr. (1 pg) (MKC)
October 11, 2001 Filing 31 ANSWER to ADC'S Third Amended complaint [24-1] and COUNTERCLAIM; jury demand by defendant. (19 pgs) (MKC)
October 3, 2001 Filing 30 MINUTES:( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / ) telephone conference. (1 pg) (MKC)
October 1, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 10/1/01) that Plaintiff's motion is Granted. Plaintiff file the original of its Third Amended Complaint as provided in Local Rule 15.1 [27-1] (1 pg) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
September 28, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 9/28/01) the briefing schedule for Panduit's summary judgment brief is as follows: ADC shall serve it response brief on or before 11/21/01 and Panduit shall serve its reply brief on or before 12/17/01. (1 pg) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
September 28, 2001 Filing 27 CONSENTED MOTION by ADC Telecommun for leave to file thrid amended complaint ( to Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) ( 72 pgs) (MKC)
September 27, 2001 Filing 26 MINUTES:( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / ) Telephone conference re: discovery issues. Plaintiff motion to extend deadlines for filing brief in opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 11/21/01 for plaintiff and 12/17/01 for reply. (1 pg) (MKC)
September 17, 2001 Filing 39 MOTION by defendant for summary judgment ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) (2 pgs) (MKC)
September 17, 2001 Filing 25 LETTER RE: SVC OF DISPOSITIVE MOTION PAPERS by Panduit Corp for summary judgment SVC.LTR. ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) pg(s) (MKC)
September 17, 2001 Filing 24 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [14-1] by plaintiff; jury demand ( 8 pgs + exhibits) (MKC)
September 14, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 9/14/01) that: Plantiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff file original of its second amended complaint as provided in Local Rule 15.1. [22-1] (1 pg) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
September 12, 2001 Filing 22 CONSENTED MOTION by plaintiff to file second amended complaint ( to Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) 2+ pg(s) (DFL)
August 23, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) modifying dats set forth in scheduling order relating to Markham hearing. 3 pg(s) (cc: all counsel) (VEM)
July 9, 2001 Filing 20 PROTECTIVE ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) ( 10 pgs) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
July 6, 2001 Filing 19 ANSWER by counter-defendant to Counterclaim [5-2] (3 pgs) (MKC)
July 3, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 7/3/1) that the Court having considered the Deft's Motion to bifurcate discovery, & having considered the same hereby denies said motion. (1pg(s) (cc: all counsel) (DDB)
July 3, 2001 Filing 17 AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 7/3/1). (2pg(s) (cc: all counsel) (DDB)
July 2, 2001 Filing 16 MINUTES:( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / ) TELEPHONE CONF. RE: DISCOVERY. (1g(s) (DDB)
June 27, 2001 Filing 15 ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, COUNTERCLAIM by defendant; jury demand . (20 pgs) (MKC)
June 20, 2001 Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiff; jury demand (64 pgs) (MKC)
June 13, 2001 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 6/13/01) that: Plaintiff file the original of its second amended complaint. [12-1] (1 pgs) (cc: counsel) (MKC)
June 8, 2001 Filing 12 PLAINTIFF'S CONSENTED TO MOTION to file first amended complaint( to Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan ) (76 pgs) (MKC)
June 1, 2001 Filing 11 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER ( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 6/1/01) ; amd complaint set for 10/1/01 ; discovery set for 12/30/01 ; non-dispositive motions set for 5/1/02 ; dispositive motions set for 7/1/02 ; ready for trial set 9/1/02 (8 pgs) (cc: counsel) (MKC)
June 1, 2001 Filing 10 PETITION AND ORDER for admission pro hac vice ( Clerk Francis E. Dosal ) on behalf of defendant by Robert McCann (1 pg) (MKC)
May 17, 2001 Filing 9 RULE 26(f) REPORT. (7 pgs) (MKC)
May 3, 2001 Filing 8 REPLY by ADC Telecommun to defendant's Counterclaim [5-2] (2 pgs) (MKC)
April 25, 2001 Filing 7 NOTICE OF( Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan / 4/25/01) ; pretrial conference set for 1:45 on 5/31/01 ; Rule 26(f) report ddl set for 5/24/01 (4 pgs) (cc: all counsel) (MKC)
April 23, 2001 Filing 6 PETITION AND ORDER for admission pro hac vice ( Clerk Francis E. Dosal ) on behalf of defendant Panduit Corp by Nicole A Fiorella (1 pg) (MKC)
April 12, 2001 Filing 4 PETITION AND ORDER for admission pro hac vice ( Clerk Francis E. Dosal ) on behalf of defendant by Curt J Whitenack. 1 pg (VEM)
April 12, 2001 Filing 3 PETITION AND ORDER for admission pro hac vice ( Clerk Francis E. Dosal ) on behalf of defendant by Daniel Boehnen. 1 pg (VEM)
April 12, 2001 Filing 2 SUMMONS - RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon deft 3/20/01 2pg(s) ( Modified on 04/16/2001
April 10, 2001 Filing 5 ANSWER to complaint [1-1] and COUNTERCLAIM; jury demand by deft against pltf. (17pg(s) (DDB)
March 15, 2001 Filing 1 COMPLAINT - Summons issued. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED. Assigned to Judge Ann D. Montgomery per patent list and referred to Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan. Receipt # 239222 for $150.00 (7 pgs + exhibits) (cc: patent office) (MKC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ADC Telecommun v. Panduit Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ADC Telecommunications, Inc.
Represented By: Alan G Carlson
Represented By: Philip P Caspers
Represented By: Timothy A Lindquist
Represented By: Dennis C Bremer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Panduit Corp
Represented By: Anthoula Pomrening
Represented By: Curt J Whitenack
Represented By: Daniel Boehnen
Represented By: Eric R Moran
Represented By: Leif R Sigmond, Jr
Represented By: Nicole A Fiorella
Represented By: Robert McCann
Represented By: Russell S Ponessa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?