Anderson v. Barnhart
Plaintiff: Randy S Anderson
Defendant: Jo Anne B Barnhart
Case Number: 0:2003cv02611
Filed: December 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
Presiding Judge: Jonathan G Lebedoff
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER re 47 Stipulation for Compromise Settlement filed by Jo Anne B Barnhart, Randy S Anderson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and on the merits without further cost to either party.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 30, 2009. (HAM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Barnhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy S Anderson
Represented By: James H Greeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jo Anne B Barnhart
Represented By: Lonnie F Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?