Isuzu Motors Limited v. Thermo King Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Minnesota District Court Isuzu Motors Limited v. Thermo King Corporation

Isuzu Motors Limited v. Thermo King Corporation

Case Number:	0:2005cv02174
Filed:	September 19, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge:	Franklin L. Noel
Presiding Judge:	John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2010	Filing 119 ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on January 11, 2010. (HAM)
September 30, 2009	Filing 112 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant's 93 Motion for Summary Judgment. 1) As to Count I, alleging unjust enrichment, defendant's motion is denied to the exte nt that it alleges that Thermo King benefited from any tooling and development expenditures made by Isuzu in reliance on Johnson's alleged November 3, 2000, promise to compensate Isuzu for a portion of those expenses. As to all other unj ust enrichment allegations, Thermo King's motion is granted.2) As to Count II, the motion is denied as to Isuzu's allegation that Thermo King made a clear and definite promise to purchase volume quantities of the 4LC2 e ngine. The motion is denied as to Isuzu's allegation that Thermo King made a clear and definite promise to pay for the specific tooling and development costs referenced in Johnson's November 3, 2000, letter.3) As to Count III, which alleges that Thermo King made a clear and definite promise to purchase ninety-six additional prototype engines, the motion is denied. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 30, 2009. (DML)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2010

Filing 119 ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on January 11, 2010. (HAM)

September 30, 2009

Filing 112 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant's 93 Motion for Summary Judgment. 1) As to Count I, alleging unjust enrichment, defendant's motion is denied to the exte nt that it alleges that Thermo King benefited from any tooling and development expenditures made by Isuzu in reliance on Johnson's alleged November 3, 2000, promise to compensate Isuzu for a portion of those expenses. As to all other unj ust enrichment allegations, Thermo King's motion is granted.2) As to Count II, the motion is denied as to Isuzu's allegation that Thermo King made a clear and definite promise to purchase volume quantities of the 4LC2 e ngine. The motion is denied as to Isuzu's allegation that Thermo King made a clear and definite promise to pay for the specific tooling and development costs referenced in Johnson's November 3, 2000, letter.3) As to Count III, which alleges that Thermo King made a clear and definite promise to purchase ninety-six additional prototype engines, the motion is denied. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 30, 2009. (DML)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Isuzu Motors Limited v. Thermo King Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?