Allan Block Corporation v. County Materials Corp. et al
| 0:2005cv02879 |
| December 12, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Joan N. Ericksen |
| Jeanne J. Graham |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
451
ORDER re 450 Letter to District Judge filed by Allan Block Corporation. IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Allan Blocks request for permission to file a motion to vacate [Docket No. 450] is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 15, 2009. (slf)
|
|
Filing
449
ORDER denying 381 Motion in Limine; denying 384 Motion in Limine; denying 387 Motion in Limine; denying 389 Motion in Limine; denying 392 Motion in Limine; reserving 395 Motion in Limine; denying 411 Motion in Limine; granting 412 Mot ion in Limine; denying 413 Motion in Limine; denying 414 Motion in Limine; reserving 415 Motion in Limine; reserving 416 Motion in Limine; and denying 420 Motion in Limine (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 6, 2009. (slf)
|
|
Filing
371
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Countys Motion to Exclude Allan Blocks Damages Related to Molds [Docket No. 302] is GRANTED IN PART as set forth in the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 358].2.Countys Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Docket No. 313] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.3.Allan Blocks Motion for Summary Judgment on Patent Validity [Docket No. 330] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.4.Countys Motion for Summary Judgment for Counts 7 and 8 of the Amended Complaint [Docket No. 335] is GRANTED.5.Count One of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED insofar as it is based on Countys alleged failure to return molds.6.Count Four, Count Five, Count Six, Count Seven, and Count Eight of the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED.7.County has not satisfied its burden of establishing that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 4,909,010 and U.S. Patent No. 5,484,236 are invalid due to anticipation.8.Claims 1, 2, 7, 11, 12, 14, 15, and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 5,484,236 are invalid due to obviousness.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 17, 2008. (slf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allan Block Corporation v. County Materials Corp. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
