Champagne Louis Roederer v. J. Garcia Carrion, S.A.
Case Number: 0:2006cv00213
Filed: January 13, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 351 ORDER (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on August 17, 2010. (slf)
August 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 346 NON-CONFIDENTIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND NON-CONFIDENTIAL CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on August 10, 2010. (slf)
July 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 328 ORDER AND INJUNCTION: IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Defendants and their agents, servants, and employees are permanently enjoined pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a) and Minn. Stat. § 325D.45(1) from using the CRISTALINO name in connection with the manu facture, importation, distribution, advertisement, promotion, sale, or offering for sale of cava or sparkling wine except in accordance with the following conditions: a.The word CRISTALINO shall be used only as part of the phrase JAUME SERRA CRISTALI NO and only in conjunction with a prominent disclaimer stating JAUME SERRA CRISTALINO is not affiliated with, sponsored by, approved by, endorsed by, or in any way connected to Louis Roederers CRISTAL champagne or Louis Roederer;b.The phrase JAUME SE RRA CRISTALINO shall only be displayed in a font dissimilar to the Roman serif font used for the word CRISTAL on bottles of CRISTAL champagne and only when the words JAUME SERRA are displayed in close proximity to the word CRISTALINO, in the same fon t as the word CRISTALINO, and in a font size at least as large as the font size of the word CRISTALINO; andc.When used on bottles of cava, the phrase JAUME SERRA CRISTALINO shall only be used on labels having a background color other than gold if the cava is a brut, dry, extra-dry, or semi-dry and other than a pink-hued copper if the cava is a ros.2.Defendants and their agents, servants, and employees are permanently enjoined pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a) and Minn. Stat. § 325D.45(1) from using any mark, word, or name similar to the CRISTALINO name that is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception with Roederers CRISTAL marks in connection with the manufacture, importation, distribution, advertisement, promotion, sale, or offering for sale of cava or sparkling wine except insofar as the use of the similar mark, word, or name complies with the conditions set forth in (1) with respect to the word CRISTALINO.3.Defendants may continue to sell their existing inventory of already-labeled bottles of CRISTALINO cava. However, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1118, all labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles, and advertisements in the possession of Defendants bearing the mark CRISTALINO, and all plates, molds , matrices, and other means for making the same, that do not conform with the requirements of this Order, shall be destroyed; and4.Within sixty (60) days after issuance of this Order, Defendants shall file with the Court a certification under oath detailing all efforts undertaken to comply with the requirements of (1), (2), and (3).LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 27, 2010. (slf)
February 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 292 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 228 Motion to Exclude; granting 231 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 245 Motion to Exclude; denying 251 Motion to Exclude (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 4, 2010. (slf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Champagne Louis Roederer v. J. Garcia Carrion, S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?