Hemmah v. Red Wing, City of
| 0:2006cv03887 |
| September 29, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Unassigned |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
ORDER denying 165 MOTION to Amend/Correct Alter or Amend an Order Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), or Relief from an Order Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) filed by Daniel Hemmah (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 22, 2010. (slf)
|
|
Filing
163
ORDER denying 157 Motion for Attorney Fees (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on January 20, 2010. (slf)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER denying 140 Motion (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 10, 2009. (slf)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 95 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law., IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Defendants Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative, for New Trial [Docket No. 95] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PAR T.2.Defendants Kay Kuhlmann and Roger Seymour are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 3.The Judgment [Docket No. 94] is VACATED as to Kuhlmann and Seymour.4.Plaintiff Daniel Hemmahs claim for denial of a name-clearing hearing against Kuhlmann a nd Seymour is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.5.Hemmah may not recover damages incurred after August 2006. The remaining damage award is remitted to $50,000. Hemmah is directed to either accept the remittitur, reducing his damage award, or ask the Co urt to schedule a new trial on the issue of damages. Hemmah shall inform the Court in writing of his decision no later than January 16, 2009. The Court will defer amending the Judgment with respect to Defendant City of Red Wing pending notification of Hemmahs position with regard to remittitur.6.To address the possibility that the portion of the Courts Order granting judgment as a matter of law could be vacated or reversed, the Court conditionally grants Defendants motion for a new trial with respect to all Defendants on the issue of damages. The Court is left with a definite and firm conviction that the jury has erred for reasons related to the sufficiency of the evidence on damages and on Defendants purported offer of a name-clearing h earing in August of 2006. The Court conditionally denies Defendants motion for a new trial with respect to all Defendants on the issues of liability and qualified immunity as the relevant facts are not sufficiently in dispute.7.Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 [Docket No. 99] remains under advisement pending notification of Hemmahs position with regard to remittitur. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 30, 2008. (slf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hemmah v. Red Wing, City of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
