Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers International Union, Local Union No. 63B v. Progress Casting Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers International Union, Local Union No. 63B
Defendant: Progress Casting Group, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2007cv00109
Filed: January 9, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Employee Pension Plan
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers International Union, Local Union No. 63B v. Progress Casting Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers International Union, Local Union No. 63B
Represented By: Roger A Jensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progress Casting Group, Inc.
Represented By: Richard A Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?