Cramer v. Iveldson et al
| Jan Cramer |
| LeBlanc, Gray, Good, Iveldson, Gierok, Polzin, DeFrance, Barton, J. Caraway, D L Stine, Michael K. Nalley, Harrell Watts and LaSalle |
| 0:2007cv00725 |
| February 1, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| St. Louis |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Susan R. Nelson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 56 Report and Recommendation, denying 21 Motion Add Additional Defendant filed by Jan Cramer, denying 28 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, granting 28 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, denying as moot 27 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jan Cramer, denying as moot 54 Motion to Order Medical Care filed by Jan Cramer (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 11/5/08. (GMO)
|
|
Filing
56
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to deny 21 MOTION to Add an Additional Defendant to Bivens Act Complaint, to grant in part and deny in part 28 MOTION to Dismiss, to deny as moot 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment, to deny as moot 54 MOTION TO ORDER MEDICAL CARE OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE IMMEDIATE RELEASE FROM CONFINEMENT. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan R. Nelson on 9/19/08. (kt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
