Kobus v. The College of St. Scholastica, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael W. Kobus
Defendant: The College of St. Scholastica, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2007cv03881
Filed: September 4, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: St. Louis
Presiding Judge: Raymond L. Erickson
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Schiltz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER granting defendant's 50 Motion for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on February 5, 2009. (dml)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kobus v. The College of St. Scholastica, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The College of St. Scholastica, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph J Roby, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael W. Kobus
Represented By: Sonja Dunnwald Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?