Burris et al v. Versa Products, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Lowell P. Burris and Joyce P. Burris
Defendant: G and L Products, Inc., Menard, Inc. and Versa Products, Inc.
Cross Claimant: Menard, Inc.
Cross Defendant: Versa Products, Inc. and G and L Products, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2007cv03938
Filed: September 11, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Anoka
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 209 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiffs' 200 Motion for New Trial, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on May 20, 2014. (DML)
August 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 149 MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER denying 118 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 120 Motion for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on August 26, 2013. (DML)
February 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. No. 128 ), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as more fully explained in the attached Memorandum; and 2. The attached Memorandum is hereby incorporated in this Order.(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 02/19/2013. (MMP)
September 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 112 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Gulf Underwriters Insurance Company's 103 Motion to Intervene (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 4, 2012. (DML)
March 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 100 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (1) granting plaintiff Gulf Underwriter Insurance Company's (33) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 0:08-cv-01292-JRT-JJK; (2) denying Defendants Lowell P. Burris and Joyc e Burris' (40) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 0:08-cv-01292-JRT-JJK; (3) denies as moot defendant's Motion to Withdraw or Amend Admissions contained within its opposition to plaintiffs' motion to dismiss in case 0:08-cv-012 92-JRT-JJK; (4) granting Gulf Underwriters Insurance Company's claim for declaratory judgment in case 0:08-cv-01292-JRT-JJK; (5) vacating the Court's 31 order staying Lowell P. Burris and Joyce P. Burris v. Versa Prods., Inc., G and L Prods., Inc., and Menard, Inc., in case 0:08-cv-01292-JRT-JJK; (6) copy of order filed in case 0:07-cv-03938-JRT-JJK; (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on March 30, 2011. Associated Cases: 0:08-cv-01292-JRT-JJK, 0:07-cv-03938-JRT-JJK(DML)
December 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER STAYING CASE for a period of six months, or until further order of the Court. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 23, 2009. (HAM)
October 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER directing response to the request for consolidation.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on October 7, 2009. (HAM)
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 93 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (1) granting defendant Menard's 38 Motion for Summary Judgment; (2) denying without prejudice defendants Versa Products and G and L Products' 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; (3) granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs' 62 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Motion is granted with respect to claims against defendants Versa Products, Inc. and G and L Products, Inc. Motion is denied with respect to claims against defendant Menard, Inc.; (4) granting defendants Versa Products and G and L Products' 67 Motion to Strike the Expert Opinion of Plaintiff's Expert, Paul Dreyer; (5) granting defendant Mena rd's 70 Motion to Strike the Expert Opinion of Plaintiff's Expert, Paul Dreyer; (6) granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs' 89 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and Disclosure Deadlines. Motion is < b>granted with respect to claims against defendants Versa Products, Inc. and G and L Products, Inc. Motion is denied with respect to claims against defendant Menard, Inc.. (7) Plaintiff's claims against defendant Menard, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice. (8) The Court directs the Magistrate Judge to issue an Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order with a brief extension of discovery deadlines for plaintiffs' claims against Versa Products, Inc. and G and L Products, Inc. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 29, 2009. (DML)
September 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 35 . Motion to Dismiss 9 filed by G and L Products, Inc., Versa Products, Inc., is denied. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 16, 2008. (HAM)
September 2, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Versa and G&L's Motion to Dismiss 9 be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 9/12/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 09/02/2008. (jz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burris et al v. Versa Products, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross claimant: Menard, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew R Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross defendant: Versa Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross defendant: G and L Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G and L Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Menard, Inc.
Represented By: Steven E Tomsche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Versa Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lowell P. Burris
Represented By: Dennis R Letourneau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joyce P. Burris
Represented By: Dennis R Letourneau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?