McKenzie v. Fabian et al
| Mwati P McKenzie |
| Joan Fabian, Lynn Dingle and Mary McComb |
| 0:2007cv04441 |
| November 1, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Washington |
| Paul A. Magnuson |
| Janie S. Mayeron |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
Order Adopting Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations 42 60 ; Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss 34 ; Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 19 ; Denying as moot Defendants' Second Motion to Extend Trial Date 57 ; and Dismissing With Prejudice the Complaint 1 . LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Senior Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 09/11/2009. (LM)
|
|
Filing
60
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lynn Dingle, Mary McComb, Joan Fabian granted. Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron on 8/12/09. (VEM)
|
|
Filing
42
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Complaint [Docket No. 34] be DENIED. 2. Plaintiff shall serve on defendants and file with the Court his response to defendants' summary judgment motion on or before July 3, 2009. Objections to R&R due by 6/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron on 6/9/09. (VEM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
