Burgi et al v. Gurstel Law Firm, PA et al
| Yvonne Burgi and Robert J Burgi |
| John and Jane Does, Gurstel Law Firm, PA and OSI Portfolio Services |
| 0:2007cv04772 |
| December 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Blue Earth |
| Raymond L. Erickson |
| Patrick J. Schiltz |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER adopting 30 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED 1. That Gurstel's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 6 ] is granted. 2. That the Burgis' Federal causes of action are dismissed with prejudice. 3. That the Burgis' State la w cause of action under the Minnesota Collection Agencies Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 332.37, is dismissed with prejudice, and any remaining State law actions be dismissed without prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 10/17/08. (sf)
|
|
Filing
30
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. That Gurstel's Motion to Dismiss 6 be granted. 2. That the Burgis' Federal causes of action be dismissed with prejudice. 3. That the Burgis' State law cause of action under the Minnesota Collection Agencies Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 332.37, be dismissed with prejudice, and any remaining State law actions be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 10/10/2008. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Raymond L. Erickson on 09/24/2008. (jz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
