El-Alamin v. Radke et al
| Malik Al-Mustafa El-Alamin |
| Jeffrey Miller, Elizabeth Dea, Erick Fleck, Minneapolis Police Department and Kurt Radke |
| 0:2007cv04879 |
| December 17, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Sherburne |
| Ann D. Montgomery |
| Janie S. Mayeron |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 116 Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 04/24/2012. (TLU) cc: Malik Al-Mustafa El-Alamin. Modified on 4/24/2012 (lmb).
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 2/5/2009. (GS)
|
|
Filing
82
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to grant 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erick Fleck, to deny as moot 63 MOTION to Stay filed by Malik Al-Mustafa El-Alamin, to deny as moot 35 MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Kurt Radke, Minneapolis Police Department, Elizabeth Dea, Jeffrey Miller, to grant 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Kurt Radke, Minneapolis Police Department, Elizabeth Dea, Jeffrey Miller; and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 12/23/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 12/9/08. (kt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
