Bowman v. Astrue et al

Bowman v. Astrue et al

Plaintiff:	Walter N. Bowman
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	0:2007cv04940
Filed:	December 27, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Carver
Presiding Judge:	Raymond L. Erickson
Presiding Judge:	Richard H. Kyle
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 18, 2009	Filing 19 ORDER DENYING 9 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; ADOPTING 17 Report and Recommendation; Remanding to the Commissioner for further proceedings. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 03/18/09. (rhks)
February 17, 2009	Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Plaintiffs Motion 9 for Summary Judgment be denied. 2. That the Defendant's Motion 12 for Summary Judgment be denied. 3. That this matter be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings, in accor dance with this Report, pursuant to Sentence 4 of Title 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). 4. That, pursuant to the holding in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 297 (1993), Judgment be entered accordingly. Objections to R&R due by 3/6/2009. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Raymond L. Erickson on 02/17/2009. (jz)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 18, 2009

Filing 19 ORDER DENYING 9 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; ADOPTING 17 Report and Recommendation; Remanding to the Commissioner for further proceedings. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 03/18/09. (rhks)

February 17, 2009

Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Plaintiffs Motion 9 for Summary Judgment be denied. 2. That the Defendant's Motion 12 for Summary Judgment be denied. 3. That this matter be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings, in accor dance with this Report, pursuant to Sentence 4 of Title 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). 4. That, pursuant to the holding in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 297 (1993), Judgment be entered accordingly. Objections to R&R due by 3/6/2009. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Raymond L. Erickson on 02/17/2009. (jz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowman v. Astrue et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walter N. Bowman
Represented By:	Edward C Olson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?