Wales v. Tran et al
| Thomas W. Wales |
| Jack Bakker, F.B.O.P., The, Shelly Stanton, Tran, Mayo Clinic, The and Anderson |
| 0:2008cv00039 |
| January 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Olmsted |
| Joan N. Ericksen |
| Janie S. Mayeron |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 144 and granting 130 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 16, 2009. (slf)
|
|
Filing
144
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 130), be GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 104), be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 11/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 11/12/09. (VEM)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 84 and granting 16 Motion to Dismiss filed by Mayo Clinic, The. Plaintiff's claims in the Complaint against Mayo Clinic ONLY are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for leave to fi le first amended complaint is denied as to the claims alleged against the Mayo Defendants. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief is denied 77 .(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on November 4, 2008. (slf) Modified on 11/19/2008 (vem).
|
|
Filing
84
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Defendant Mayo Clinic's Motion to Dismiss 16 be GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff's claims in the Complaint against Mayo Clinic, Rochester, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File "P laintiff's First Amended Complaint" pursuant to FRCivP. Rule 15(a) 69 ) be DENIED IN PART as to the claims alleged against the Mayo Defendants; and4. Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief or [sic] in the Alternative Writ of Mandamus 77 be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 10/28/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 10/14/08.(VEM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
