Vargo-Schaper v. Weyerhaeuser Company
Plaintiff: Betty Vargo-Schaper
Defendant: Weyerhaeuser Company
Case Number: 0:2008cv00310
Filed: February 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: Boylan
Presiding Judge: Kyle
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting 29 Motion for Summary Judgment, dismissing with prejudice 1 Complaint; third-party Complaint 19 is Moot and is dismissed without prejudice. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 08/05/09. (kll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vargo-Schaper v. Weyerhaeuser Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weyerhaeuser Company
Represented By: Brian A Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Vargo-Schaper
Represented By: Kenneth N Potts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?