SDT Holdings, LLC v. United States of America et al
| SDT Holdings, LLC |
| United States of America, John Doe and Mary Roe |
| 0:2008cv00687 |
| March 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Noel |
| Tunheim |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 Interpleader Action |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 7 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs Complaint [Docket No. 1], is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; andThe Clerk of Court is directed to return the Original Share Certificate, representing Two Million Ei ght Hundred Thousand (2,800,000) Shares of Espre Solutions Inc. stock issued to Plaintiff SDT Holdings dated March 7, 2008, from the Court Registry, to Plaintiff SDT Holdings.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on June 25, 2009. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 1 ), be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 2. The Clerk of Court be directed to return the Original Share Certificate, representing Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand (2,800,000) Shares of Espre Solutions Inc. stock issued to Plaintiff SDT Holdings dated March 7, 2008, from the Court Registry, to Plaintiff SDT Holdings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 06/01/2009. (MMP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
