Zutz et al v. Nelson et al
Loren J Zutz and Elden J Elseth |
John Nelson, Arlyn Stroble, RoughRider Legal Support Services, Inc, Danny Omdahl, Nick Drees and Douglas Kamrowski |
0:2008cv00958 |
April 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Marshall |
Ericksen |
Erickson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 130 ORDER re: 34 Motion to Dismiss; 39 Motion for Summary Judgment; and 22 Motion to Dismiss., IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants Nelson and Strobles Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice [Docket No. 22] is GRANTED to the extent herein indicated. 2. De fendants Drees and Omdahls Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 34] is GRANTED to the extent herein indicated. 3. Defendants Kawrowski and RoughRider Legal Support Services Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 39] is GRANTED to the extent herein indicated. 4. Counts I, II, and VII of Plaintiffs Complaint [Docket No. 1] are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 5. Counts III, IV, V, and VI of Plaintiffs Complaint [Docket No. 1] are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on January 23, 2009. (slf) Modified text on 1/26/2009 (lph). |
Filing 128 ORDER re 91 APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge re 85 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on January 14, 2009. (slf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.