McCoy v. Qwest Corp.
Plaintiff: Kimberly G. McCoy
Defendant: Qwest Corp.
Case Number: 0:2008cv01172
Filed: April 29, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: Doty
Presiding Judge: Graham
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting 14 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 29 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 09/24/2009. (PJM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Qwest Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qwest Corp.
Represented By: Kristy L Albrecht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly G. McCoy
Represented By: Sonja Dunnwald Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?