Crow v. Fabian et al
| Keith Crow |
| Joan Fabian, David R. Crist, Jerry Clay, Lcie Stevenson, Lynn Milling, John M. Stuart and Mark Anderson |
| 0:2008cv03350 |
| June 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Noel |
| Schiltz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER - Based on the foregoing and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Court's order of February 26, 2010 100 and the judgment entered pursuant to that order 102 are VACATED; Plaintiff Keith C row's objection 101 to the Report and Recommendation is OVERRULED; Judge Noel's Report and Recommendation 98 is ADOPTED; and This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 06/04/10. (bjs)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER adopting Report and Recommenation 98 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 34 is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [[66-1], pp. 97-103] is DENIED; 3. Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendant Lynn Milling; and 4. This action is dismissed with prejudice.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 2/26/10. (sf)
|
|
Filing
98
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that: 1. Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment, (Docket No. 34), be GRANTED; 2. Plaintiffs Motion For Summary Judgment, (Docket No. 66-1, pp. 97-103), be DENIED; 3. Summary Judgment be GRANTED in favor of Defendant Lynn Milling; and 4. This action be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 2/18/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 2/4/10. (jam)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER - Based on the foregoing and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiff's [Request for] Permission to File Late Objection to Report and Recommendation 71 is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 10/15/09. (bjs)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER adopting 47 Report and Recommendation; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunction [Docket Nos. 17 , 29 are DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 9/18/09. (sf)
|
|
Filing
47
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to deny 29 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Keith Crow, 17 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Keith Crow Objections to R&R due by 8/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 8/13/09. (kt)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Joan Fabian, John M. Stuart, and Mark F. Anderson are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); and 2. Plaintiff's claims against the remaining Defendants in this case will be allowed to proceed at this time, without prejudice to any defenses that those Defendants may later seek to raise.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 10/21/08. (sf)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that: 1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Joan Fabian, John M. Stuart, and Mark F. Anderson, be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); and 2. Plaintiff's claims against the remaining Defendants in this case be allowed to proceed at this time, without prejudice to any defenses that those Defendants may later seek to raise. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 9/17/08. (jam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
