Krutchen v. Zayo Bandwidth Northeast, LLC et al
James C. Krutchen |
Zayo Group Inc., Zayo Bandwidth Northeast, LLC and Onvoy, Inc. |
0:2008cv04737 |
July 18, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Frank |
Noel |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. See Order for details. 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 55) is GRANTED IN PART (insofar as it seeks judgment on Counts I, III, IV, V, VI, IX and those portions of Counts VII & VIII seeking seve rance benefits and a quarterly bonus) and DENIED IN PART (insofar as it seeks judgment on those portions of Counts VII & VIII seekingunreimbursed business expenses). 2. Counts I, III, IV, V, VI and IX, as well as those portions of Counts VII and VIII seeking severance benefits and the quarterly bonus are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 3/1/2010. (BJS) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss and Transfer. Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to Count II of the Amended Complaint. Defendants Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Counts I, IV, V, VI and IX of the Amended Complaint. Defendants request that the Court transfer venue is DENIED. (Written opinion) Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 12/4/08. (GMO) Modified on 12/5/2008 (lph). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.