Safco Products Co. v. Gleason Corporation et al
| Safco Products Co. |
| Gleason Corporation and Welcom Products, Inc. |
| 0:2008cv04918 |
| August 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Graham |
| Tunheim |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
210
ORDER ruling that: (1) Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 161] is GRANTED IN PART (insofar as it seeks a judgment on Defendants' invalidity defenses of anticipation and obviousness and on its affirmative defenses of laches, e quitable estoppel and waiver) and DENIED IN PART (insofar as it seeks a judgment of infringement and "validity" and a judgment on Welcom's counterclaim under the Lanham Act as well as its inequitable conduct defense); (2) Plaintiff 9;s motion to exclude testimony and opinions [Doc. No. 157] is GRANTED IN PART (insofar as it seeks to exclude the opinions and testimony of Mr. Gwin) and DENIED IN PART (insofar as it seeks to exclude the opinions and testimony of Dr. Erdman); (3) a nd Welcom's motion for claim construction, summary judgment of patent invalidity, and for summary adjudication of co-inventorship [Doc. No. 166] is GRANTED IN PART (insofar as it seeks claim construction for purposes of inventorship) and DENIED IN PART (insofar as it seeks a judgment of invalidity for derivation or for failure to name the correct inventors).(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 07/01/11. (MJC)
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER DENYING 50 Motion to Dismiss as follows: The Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is DENIED with prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss for improper venue is DENIED without prejudice.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on August 2, 2010. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER re 119 Stipulation, filed by Safco Products Co., Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Safco Products Co.'s Response to Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A.'s Motion for Establishment of Attorney's Lien and for Entry of Judgment shall be filed with the Court and served no later than February 19, 2010.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on February 14, 2010. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER re 116 Stipulation, filed by Safco Products Co., Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Safco Products Co.'s Response to Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A.'s Motion for Establishment of Attorney's Lien and for Entry of Judgment shall be filed with the Court and served no later than February 5, 2010. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on February 1, 2010. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER re 113 Stipulation, filed by Safco Products Co., Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Safco Products Co.'s Response to Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A.'s Motion for Establishment of Attorney's Lien and for Entry of Judgment shall be filed with the Court and served no later than January 29, 2010.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on January 21, 2010. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER re 110 Stipulation, filed by Safco Products Co., Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Safco Products Co.'s Response to Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A.'s Motion for Establishment of Attorney's Lien and for Entry of Judgment shall be filed with the Court and served no later than January 22, 2010.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on January 18, 2010. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER re 74 Stipulation, filed by Safco Products Co., Kerry Welsh, Welcom Products, Inc., John Evanthes. Defendants Evanthes and Welsh's reply toPlaintiff Safco Products Co.'s response to Defendant Evanthes and Welsh's motion to dismiss shall be filed with the Court and served no later than November 20, 2009.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on November 16, 2009. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER re 67 Stipulation, filed by Safco Products Co. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Safco Products Co.'s response to the motion to dismiss [Docket No. 50] shall be filed with the Court and served no later than November 6, 2009. Defendants reply shall be filed with the Court and served no later than eight days thereafter.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on November 2, 2009. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER re 64 Stipulation, filed by Safco Products Co. Plaintiff Safco Products Co.'s response to Defendant Evanthes and Welsh's motion to dismiss [Docket No. 50] shall be filed with the Court and served no later than October 30, 2009. Defendants Evanthes and Welsh's reply shall be filed with the Court and served no later than eight days thereafter.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on October 22, 2009. (HAM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
