Riley et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
Debra Riley and Marlyn Riley |
Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson |
0:2008cv05031 |
August 27, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Grant |
Erickson |
Schiltz |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER granting 4 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The following claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as described more fully in the text of the Court's opinion: Plaintiffs' claims of failure to warn, fraud, express warranty, manuf acturing defect, and loss of consortium, insofar as such claims are premised on conduct (1) that violates the FDCA or its implementing regulations, and (2) that would give rise to a recovery under state law even in the absence of the FDCA or its impl ementing regulations. Plaintiffs may, within thirty days of the date of this order, file an amended complaint asserting the claims that have been dismissed without prejudice in 2 of this order. On the filing of an amended complaint, the stay 38 w ill be lifted. All remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS. If plaintiffs fail to file an amended complaint as permitted in 2-3 within thirty days of this order, the Court will enter a final judgment disposing of this case. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 06/05/09. (bjs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.