Gempeler v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
| Geoffrey J. Gempeler |
| Bruce Carr, Marco Cat, L.L.P., TCK, L.L.P., Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and K. Patrick Kruchten |
| TCK, L.L.P., Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Marco Cat, L.L.P. |
| Geoffrey J. Gempeler |
| 0:2008cv05094 |
| September 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Todd |
| Erickson |
| Frank |
| Contract: Other |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 Default of Promissory Note |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT. 1. That consistent with the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Plaintiff Geoffrey J. Gempeler is entitled to a judgment of this Court in the amount of $1,250,500.29. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 2/25/2010. (BJS)
|
|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. Plaintiff is entitled to a default judgment against Defendants Carr and Kruchten on Count V of the First Amended Complaint; 2. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 78 ) is DENIED AS MOOT; and 3. Plaintiff shall advise the Court by 4:00 p.m., Wednesday, January 28, 2010, as to what issues, if any, including damages, remain for the Court to decide.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 1/22/2010. (BJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
